Thursday, February 27, 2020

Assignment3 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Assignment3 - Assignment Example This is a public case since it draws the interest of all society members. Evidently, police brutality is a matter of concern for all. A jury was therefore involved in determining the case. Apparently, the jury represents the stance of the common people and is usually called upon when matters of public concern are being determined. The burden of proof means the obligation to provide evidence that either incriminates or absolves an accused person. The legal standard that should be applied in this case is that of establishment of proof beyond any reasonable doubt. The plaintiffs asked for both compensatory and punitive damages. They wanted compensation to recover what they had lost due to the unlawful arrest and sought punitive damages to punish the crime perpetrators. Punitive damages are appropriate in this case since the police violated the rights of the Martinez family. The granting of punitive damages by the jury serves as deterrence for Denver State authorities and other who may be inclined to act in a similar manner against their people. The defendant most likely alluded to the seriousness of the war on drugs that they were involved in during the time of the raid. The article reports that the police raided the family home looking for drug dealers who had vacated the premises a month before. (6 points) What result or outcome do you think the case should have? How should the court rule? (Or, if the court has ruled, do you agree with the outcome? Why or why not?) Use course concepts to explain your answer. I agree with the outcome of the case. The jury’s decision to award compensation to the plaintiff is commendable under the tenets of justice. The unlawful arrest had violated the balance of justice hence there was need for reparation. If the Denver city pays the price of the actions of its officers, the leaders are likely to demand the proper performance of duties among its officers, leading to a better

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning Essay

Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning - Essay Example It also accused a senior church official of knowingly endangering thousands of children by shielding accused priests for years. The Philadelphia district attorney brought sexual-assault charges against the priests and teacher, and charged Msgr. William Lynn, with two counts of child endangerment, apparently the first time a church leader has been criminally charged with covering up abuse. Monsignor Lynn was secretary of the clergy under retired Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, responsible for investigating abuse allegations from 1992 to 2004. Instead, according to the grand jury, he shuffled credibly accused priests among unsuspecting parishes, putting â€Å"literally thousands of children at risk of sexual abuse.† (5)The report said at least three dozen accused priests remain in active ministry in the archdiocese, nearly all unidentified. (6)The grand jury asked the archdiocese for its records on the accusations against those priests; months later, (7) the archdiocese has not ful ly complied. (8)These are not the first accusations against the Philadelphia Archdiocese. A blistering grand-jury report in 2005 exposed the abuse of hundreds of children by more than 60 archdiocesan priests, lamenting that the church’s cover-up had succeeded since the statute of limitations made it impossible to prosecute the predators.